I found a piece of the page. The snapshot above doesn't show the heading "FTC Fraud Survey" which is h5. It's included here:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
"
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>Consumer Protection</title>
<meta http-equiv = "Content-Type" content = "text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
</head>
<body>
<h5>
FTC Fraud Survey
</h5>
<br>
<div style = "float: left; width: 1px; height: 80px;">
</div>
<div style = "float: left; clear: left; padding-top: 2px; padding-bottom: 5px; margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 12px; margin-bottom: 12px; background-color: rgb(236,242,236); border-style: solid; border-width: 1px; border-color: rgb(221,232,221);">
<h6 style = "font-family: verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: bold; margin-left: 14px; margin-top: 4px; padding-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 4px; padding-bottom: 0px;">
Top 10 Frauds (FTC)
</h6>
<ol style = "padding-bottom: 8px; margin-bottom: 0px; padding-top: 6px; padding-left: 33px; padding-right: 4px; margin-left: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<li>Advance-fee loan scams—4.55 million victims</li>
<li>Buyers clubs—4.05 million victims</li>
<li>Credit card insurance—3.35 million victims</li>
<li>Credit repair—2 million victims</li>
<li>Prize promotions—1.8 million victims</li>
<li>Internet services—1.75 million victims</li>
<li>Pyramid schemes—1.55 million victims</li>
<li>Information services—.8 million victims</li>
<li>Government job offers—.65 million victims</li>
<li>Business opportunities—.45 million victims</li>
</ol>
<div style = "font-size: 7pt; font-family: verdana, sans-serif; margin-left: 7px; line-height: 12px;">
<span style = "font-style: italic;">FTC Releases Consumer Fraud Survey</span>
<br>
<span style = "font-style: normal;">August 5, 2004</span>
</div>
</div>
<p style = "padding-top: 16px;">
In 2003, the FTC "commissioned a survey of 2,500 randomly-chosen adults about their consumer experiences during the previous year." On August 5, 2004, the FTC published the results in <a href = "
http://www.ftc.gov/reports/consumerfrau ... i>Consumer Fraud in the United States: An FTC Survey</i></a>, which showed that over one in ten Americans were fraud victims. The <a href = "
http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2004/08/fraudsurvey.htm">press release</a> announcing the report includes "the top 10 frauds listed in the report." Those ten were the only types of fraud that survey participants were asked about, representing "...the most prevalent types of complaints reported in the FTC's complaint database..." and "...frauds that have frequently led to FTC enforcement actions."
</p>
<p>
Also studied in the survey were "two additional situations that frequently indicate that a fraud may have occurred....(1) paying for a product or service that a consumer does not receive and (2) being billed for a product [other than products covered in the top ten frauds], that a consumer had not agreed to purchase" and "'slamming'—a situation in which a consumer's long distance telephone service is switched from one carrier to another without the consumer's permission." The survey found that an estimated 13.9 million consumers were victims of slamming.
</p>
<p>
The report tries to justify the "conservative" method used to determine who's a victim with a footnote that says "In the context of a randomized telephone study, we have very limited information about the nature of the businesses with whom the consumers were interacting." The study is useful, but could have been more accurate.
</p>
<p>
Also studied in the survey were "two additional situations that frequently indicate that a fraud may have occurred....(1) paying for a product or service that a consumer does not receive and (2) being billed for a product [other than products covered in the top ten frauds], that a consumer had not agreed to purchase" and "'slamming'—a situation in which a consumer's long distance telephone service is switched from one carrier to another without the consumer's permission." The survey found that an estimated 13.9 million consumers were victims of slamming.
</p>
<p>
The report tries to justify the "conservative" method used to determine who's a victim with a footnote that says "In the context of a randomized telephone study, we have very limited information about the nature of the businesses with whom the consumers were interacting." The study is useful, but could have been more accurate.
</p>
<p>
Also studied in the survey were "two additional situations that frequently indicate that a fraud may have occurred....(1) paying for a product or service that a consumer does not receive and (2) being billed for a product [other than products covered in the top ten frauds], that a consumer had not agreed to purchase" and "'slamming'—a situation in which a consumer's long distance telephone service is switched from one carrier to another without the consumer's permission." The survey found that an estimated 13.9 million consumers were victims of slamming.
</p>
<p>
The report tries to justify the "conservative" method used to determine who's a victim with a footnote that says "In the context of a randomized telephone study, we have very limited information about the nature of the businesses with whom the consumers were interacting." The study is useful, but could have been more accurate.
</p>
</div> <!-- End of Item class -->
</body>
</html>