Re: Little Rants
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2022 7:45 am
UPS - Image screenshot
In addition to what I mentioned in the previous posting, a lot of suspicious activity seems to be going on with this (is UPS pretending it's attempting to ship this back just to keep their numbers going, and to not be accountable since they messed up by claiming it exceeded the 150 lb limit?)
UPS has a culture of non-accountability when it comes to damage and attempts to deliver.
I put notation suggesting that a "USP" delivery text message smishing attempt received immediately after purchasing the item was somehow faking a tracking number in order to fraudulently manipulate the shipping service?
If the shipper doesn't just send an empty package or envelope with a tracking number, they also have a way to manipulate the automation on Ebay or UPS's end, where people aren't able to refute the claim it was delivered, since no details can be easily revealed unless you log into the legit tracking service.
I was trying to be diligent and document irregularities so that way I would be protected when making a claim, and the seller attempted to claim I needed to retract the return in order to not make Ebay automatically refund me the shipment (which only works if an actual return was authorized and shows accepted, which incidentally shows on their end as being in California, so as to why it documented received at my address in Dallas, TX right after this showed as 'Driver Release' it seems as if UPS is constantly updating while also making very odd additional notations that seem to show up as glitches in the system.
Since the seller seems less than trustworthy, I highly suspect that any negative feedback they receive get's argued against with the apparent "proof" of delivery, so unless someone does a neutral feedback, it's difficult to get a legitimate interpretation of how ethical they are.
I offered to accept the shipment considering I doubt that the actual damage inspection that was scheduled had actually went through, and the package I was intended to receive could not possibly have arrived within 14 hours if it was intended to be delivered, so I figured I would offer the seller to return the replacement before it ships out here, and comp $70 for the damage (which I photographed and added to the claim report.)
4PX tracking and 4PX Express warehouses operate very sketchy, or the UPS truck delivery was just trying to keep their numbers looking like they didn't screw up in transit, so they manually typed in what was on the manifest for followup. The package itself was also completely inadequate and evidently fell apart, and whoever taped it clearly struggled to return it back into the box, so I suspect UPS wasn't claiming they damaged it and refused to accept to compensate the company (so it was perhaps a last-ditch effort to skirt the blame onto me as recipient?
Here is a scary visual of the shipping dock fully open at that warehouse, where literally anyone could grab from it and drive off, and the packages are scattered all over.
https://goo.gl/maps/eQojejv4wyjCL6X46
I should also mention that the seller specifically mentioned, "returns not allowed" so I suspect this was their convenient way to dodge accountability if they could get away with it?
The Trans Rush sign on that building can be found to the left and right of 4PX, so it must be connected to the 4PX service, and is listed as permanently closed, and the warehouse return delivery attempts specifically says they refused delivery when evidently they didn't have one if it's still being shown as attempted pickup or whatever is messed up in the system, but they might have redirected the package back saying, 'Look, it says Online Seller!'
5582 Grace Pl, Commerce, CA 90022
My guess is such a large shipping service as 4PX might have multiple channel partners who claim they are the authentic brand and seller, and are just creating new fly by night operations that can game the system long enough, with zero accountability. Maybe some of the sellers go out of their way to maintain a good reputation whereas others with less reputation get to funnel tracking info and other stuff, to profit on fraudulantly claimed deliveries (so unless they specifically spent $600 on something and posted as a neutral comment, you wouldn't know they were doing that, and if it was posted as a negative they could refute it on Ebay and have that mention get removed. . .
These comments are reflecting my same sentiments (these are fraudulent sellers. Even the information I found online was changed when I pointed out on the claims information, that they were shipping from this warehouse, and previously it showed as a place located near a mall in Tokyo.
https://www.trustpilot.com/review/en.4px.com?page=3
In addition to what I mentioned in the previous posting, a lot of suspicious activity seems to be going on with this (is UPS pretending it's attempting to ship this back just to keep their numbers going, and to not be accountable since they messed up by claiming it exceeded the 150 lb limit?)
UPS has a culture of non-accountability when it comes to damage and attempts to deliver.
I put notation suggesting that a "USP" delivery text message smishing attempt received immediately after purchasing the item was somehow faking a tracking number in order to fraudulently manipulate the shipping service?
If the shipper doesn't just send an empty package or envelope with a tracking number, they also have a way to manipulate the automation on Ebay or UPS's end, where people aren't able to refute the claim it was delivered, since no details can be easily revealed unless you log into the legit tracking service.
I was trying to be diligent and document irregularities so that way I would be protected when making a claim, and the seller attempted to claim I needed to retract the return in order to not make Ebay automatically refund me the shipment (which only works if an actual return was authorized and shows accepted, which incidentally shows on their end as being in California, so as to why it documented received at my address in Dallas, TX right after this showed as 'Driver Release' it seems as if UPS is constantly updating while also making very odd additional notations that seem to show up as glitches in the system.
Since the seller seems less than trustworthy, I highly suspect that any negative feedback they receive get's argued against with the apparent "proof" of delivery, so unless someone does a neutral feedback, it's difficult to get a legitimate interpretation of how ethical they are.
I offered to accept the shipment considering I doubt that the actual damage inspection that was scheduled had actually went through, and the package I was intended to receive could not possibly have arrived within 14 hours if it was intended to be delivered, so I figured I would offer the seller to return the replacement before it ships out here, and comp $70 for the damage (which I photographed and added to the claim report.)
4PX tracking and 4PX Express warehouses operate very sketchy, or the UPS truck delivery was just trying to keep their numbers looking like they didn't screw up in transit, so they manually typed in what was on the manifest for followup. The package itself was also completely inadequate and evidently fell apart, and whoever taped it clearly struggled to return it back into the box, so I suspect UPS wasn't claiming they damaged it and refused to accept to compensate the company (so it was perhaps a last-ditch effort to skirt the blame onto me as recipient?
Here is a scary visual of the shipping dock fully open at that warehouse, where literally anyone could grab from it and drive off, and the packages are scattered all over.
https://goo.gl/maps/eQojejv4wyjCL6X46
I should also mention that the seller specifically mentioned, "returns not allowed" so I suspect this was their convenient way to dodge accountability if they could get away with it?
The Trans Rush sign on that building can be found to the left and right of 4PX, so it must be connected to the 4PX service, and is listed as permanently closed, and the warehouse return delivery attempts specifically says they refused delivery when evidently they didn't have one if it's still being shown as attempted pickup or whatever is messed up in the system, but they might have redirected the package back saying, 'Look, it says Online Seller!'
5582 Grace Pl, Commerce, CA 90022
My guess is such a large shipping service as 4PX might have multiple channel partners who claim they are the authentic brand and seller, and are just creating new fly by night operations that can game the system long enough, with zero accountability. Maybe some of the sellers go out of their way to maintain a good reputation whereas others with less reputation get to funnel tracking info and other stuff, to profit on fraudulantly claimed deliveries (so unless they specifically spent $600 on something and posted as a neutral comment, you wouldn't know they were doing that, and if it was posted as a negative they could refute it on Ebay and have that mention get removed. . .
These comments are reflecting my same sentiments (these are fraudulent sellers. Even the information I found online was changed when I pointed out on the claims information, that they were shipping from this warehouse, and previously it showed as a place located near a mall in Tokyo.
https://www.trustpilot.com/review/en.4px.com?page=3