Did The National Parks Service Murder Paul Fugate?
https://youtu.be/ZBgqJqTuZFg
I was thinking the video might be alleging at around 20 minutes is the guy might have been offed by some kind of guerilla warfare tactics from isolated Apache tribes that still linger in the area (which might be a bit of a stretch, though I'm still watching it, and it seems it was really more of a, "fuck around and find out" from "bros" of some young tartlet while he was married, but it might actually be an attempt to seek revenge and get insurance fraud by his wife who he wasn't living with, if not the guy himself was going into hiding himself and seems to have suspected he would be offed.) I think his wife with strabismus is responsible, though she would have required someone to carry it out as I doubt she could do it herself, though it seems like his will was written out with the intent of his wife carrying out his disappearance (and maybe she requested he did it in advance of planning something, or she isn't saying anything about why he felt the need to write something up?) A lot of highly suspicious stuff is connected to her, but it's undetermined, and too much weird crap confused the situation due to people that might have used the story to try and get attention or possible benefits for "complying/lying" to law enforcement who thought they might have a clue which they probably didn't.
He references this article
The Search for a Ranger Who Was Lost and Never Found
https://www.outsideonline.com/outdoor-a ... er-search/
I was a little surprised by where the video led into as it was getting into the Spanish-American war and then what would continue into the Apache wars--specifically Conchise who was directly involved with Geronimo who would continue on without him after his capture--and then I was starting to think of Pancho Villa who I think of as the proto Che Guevara of sociopaths elevated to hero status similar to the treatment Griselda Blanco is receiving in modern entertainment ever since the trend of Dexter, Breaking Bad, and perhaps to some extent Mr. Robot has taken effect in modern "entertainment," though arguably the anti-hero trend likely predates Pulp Fiction and whatever else in Westerns films like Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kids (not the retarded ass cartoon that came after it.)
I'm making comparison of the public perception vs the reality
Che Guevara was an evil, possibly psychopathic, idiot
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opin ... hic-idiot/
******************************************
This stuff is nearly impossible not to laugh at (I believe it actually takes itself seriously, but I don't see how this crap ever survived the 1990s era when this fascist military-obsessed bullshit was appealing to dumb kids with access to a computer. I wasn't interested in it but I am reminded of the movie American History X where the guy gets fucked in prison, thinking he was going to find more camaraderie in prison with the neo-nazi culture he thought he would find there. . . He did "come closer," however.)
One of the videos suggests that a seagull attacking an orthodox Jew was somehow race inspired.
I think the uploader might actually be pro-Israel, and just documenting the viewpoints of the anti-zionists, because another "folder" shows the Palestinian Hamas activities, which kind of supports Israel's response.
The irony (if you want to call it that) is that the majority of the people in the Levant region descend from the same Canaanite traditions.
Jews and Arabs Descended from Canaanites
https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/dai ... Canaanites.
Some would argue the Jews are more European at this point, if not Khazars.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khazar_hy ... i_ancestry
Others insist their is no real significant evidence for it.
No evidence from genome-wide data of a Khazar origin for the Ashkenazi Jews
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25079123/
I'm wondering if the diaspora (which the Abby Martin video interviews Jews who claim they were kicked out of Israel) wasn't just a natural phenomenon of gradual social changes in the area following Roman occupation and the rebellion by the Jews, and the continued influence of Islam and Christianity as a consequence of being in a social hub of competing cultures?
Israel deliberately forgets its history
https://mondediplo.com/2008/09/07israel
"An Israeli historian suggests the diaspora was the consequence, not of the expulsion of the Hebrews from Palestine, but of proselytising across north Africa, southern Europe and the Middle East"
(According to this article the above might not have been the case, and I tend to agree with it, since converting 'Gentiles' was really something that only occurred within the fringes of what Christianity became.)
Judaism before 100 ce Proselytes and Proselytizing
https://academic.oup.com/book/4777/chap ... m=fulltext
Arguably, the threat of Christianity was initially a trend of Judaism to convert people, which became a subset of what lead up to Constantine eventually identifying himself much like Amenhotep 3 as a singular diety, through Mithraism (as Sol Invictus,) which then becomes a propaganda device following his death to convert the "Barbarians" to try and keep them under wraps. For the longest time if you were an outside culture that was attempting to convert people to your cause, you were deemed a threat, but it was moreso that actual Christians killed the Christians they disagreed with. Modern Televangelists have historical roots in Evangelicals that burned people at the stakes; just now they would rather you suffer for being poor and not donating more money. Let the unwashed masses then do their bidding to tell you were you belong, you heathen.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_o ... man_Empire
Spoiler
Show
Roman general Pompey conquered Jerusalem and its surroundings by 63 BCE. The Romans deposed the ruling Hasmonean dynasty of Judaea (in power from c. 140 BCE) and the Roman Senate declared Herod the Great "King of the Jews" in c. 40 BCE. Judea proper, Samaria and Idumea became the Roman province of Iudaea in 6 CE. Jewish–Roman tensions resulted in several Jewish–Roman wars between the years 66 and 135 CE, which resulted in the destruction of Jerusalem and the Second Temple and the institution of the Jewish Tax in 70 (those who paid the tax were exempt from the obligation of making sacrifices to the Roman imperial cult).
After the (western) Roman's were beginning to fade away from influence, it was the Byzantian transition that took over until the Arabs then dominated.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palaestina_Secunda
Also, the Jews in the video like to believe that had Israelis not lived there it would have looked like squaler, and that they don't have a history of burning the ancestral Olive groves owned by the Palestinians, or sprayed raw sewage on them to get them to leave, while acquiring billions upon billions of US state treasury money to assist them out.
No bias detected. . .
Though I can see why people would be biased.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Be%27eri
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel%E2%80%93Hamas_war
**********************
Considering the cultural aspects, some could argue that Israel was seen in the same way as a warmongering nation, to that of Islam. The identity of the Jews comprises of Egyptian, Syrian (ergo the more ancient temple that Solomon basically copied in a smaller footprint,) and Babylonian (hence the Talmud was influenced by and written up into the Middle Ages which comprises of some of the more extremist viewpoints that alienated the Jews from European culture who saw them as a threat to the then prevailing Christian identity.)
Most of it is tribalism:
When people talk about getting over "shared differences" they are overlooking the proclivity of people to see "others" in competition over their desire to acquire more resources; hence the "don't body shame" (let that person get even fatter so I don't have to compete with them for sexual competition --> I want to shove my eggs in someone's face for breakfast and I'm going to ensure I have an equal reproductive chance as the next cannon fodder of "progress" for equality.)
The Universe-25 (the "Rat Utopia") experiment could explain much of the problems with modern society, or any society where populations are forced into a limited social structure of (mal)adaptive identities. If society wants to believe all issue stem from genetics, they will need to answer why those components of biology evolved in the first place, and assume that they aren't adaptive for the sake of evolutionary necessity (which have since become a negative trait when society then depends on things that weren't commonplace "in the wild" of human evolution.) Of course, nature is very deranged by itself, but for our society to assume it hasn't become part of the problem and produced intergenerational trauma in addition to develop a hierarchical system that reinforces the negative traits of society from centuries of tribalistic hierarchies, it assumes that all systems aren't prone to entropy (if we are expected to reward the status quo as a natural order of how things should be.)