Little Rants
Re: Little Rants
Charlie Kirk advocated for being gaslighted and following teachings that were intended to brainwash generations of people towards ideologies that were antithetical to ethical treatment of anyone more than the so-called 'Author(s)' of the book(s).
It's a circle jerk of self-defeating ideologies, where advocates to tribalistic thinking can get deindividuated people with brain rot to obsequiously prostrate themselves before the pillar, of those like Charlie who existed vicariously through the verboten texts, echoed through religion or "good" sounding ideas which always has a gray area that proscribes antipathy towards actual "empathy," hence why he conflated the pretense of "sympathy" and it's expression which connotes a socio-cultural hegemony of fakery to appear outwardly sacrosanct, while being sycophantic towards the "Leader" or whomever they seek approval from; forgetting that within their self-serving interests, that a palimpsest has eked itself out through the pages and managed to be forgotten as to the origin of the source material--the age old iteration on previous ideas that they rob the identity of--forgetting their "greatness" is only as good as attrition hasn't caught up, or entropy, with their existence.
Hammurabi would have a word with Charlie Kirk, and perhaps would scald his tongue with a hot iron, though I don't believe Charlie cared for transparency and was merely a grifter for easy score points where no one can have a say in edgewise.
How many people succumbed to the torture and emotional abuse of such people; those who considered their relationship transactional--trauma-bonding with their "maker"--and having a superficial relation and being complacent with a false-sense of security.
The racists and sexists statements that Charlie Kirk is known for suggests, that the times he was a "good" person can easily hemorrhage when you contrast it with his bad ideologies.
The same lies regarding employment statistics are the same lies he perpetuated about immigration (since no one was around to document or deport, he pretends like he's reversing the data that is shown on people that cross the border, when the only real reason "so many" were "flooding the country" is because Biden actually had accurate reports done instead of putting his head in the sand, while actually doing something about the issue, rather than exploiting the vitriol and hate to game the grift wagon towards whatever populist ideology was convenient for him.)
Trump Inherits Better Southern Border Situation Than He Left Biden
https://www.newsweek.com/southern-borde ... rt-2019770
Charlie Kirk believed that Trump was doing the right thing with immigration, when it's very apparent that he isn't, and his "base" has more in common with the "sundown towns,"
Charlie Kirk advocated for armed violence when the political theater no longer represented "them" (and who are "them" is the crux of the argument, since anyone with bias can selectively filter through their own desired wish-fulfillment.)